Author:
Lohmann Henning,Wang Hequn
Abstract
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has had severe social and economic consequences. Governments have implemented or expanded a number of policy measures to cope with these consequences. In the paper, we ask whether there is more support for general social policy measures to compensate for the new uncertainties arising from the pandemic. Using survey data collected in two panel waves in March and June/July 2020, we analyse how public welfare attitudes have changed during the first phase of the pandemic in Germany. In addition to the individual-level survey data, we use time-varying regional data on infection and unemployment rates. We provide descriptive results and employ fixed-effects regressions. Our results show small changes in welfare attitudes, but we do not find evidence for increased public support for general social policy measures.
Reference43 articles.
1. Alesina, Alberto; Giuliano, Paola (2011): “Preferences for Redistribution”, in: Jess Benhabib; Alberto Bisin; Matthew 0. Jackson (eds.): Handbook of Social Economics. Volume 1. North-Holland: Elsevier, 93–131.
2. Alesina, Alberto; La Ferrara, Eliana (2005): “Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities”, Iournal of Public Economics 89(5–6): 897–931.
3. Anderson, Christopher J.; Hecht, Jason D. (2018): “The Preference for Europe: Public Opinion about European Integration since 1952”, European Union Politics 19(4): 617–638.
4. Beblo, Miriam; Bublitz, Elisabeth; Jäger, Julian; Lohmann, Henning; Wang, Hequn (2021): SOECBIAS data set: Socioeconomic data on income (mis-)perceptions and redistributive preferences in four EU Member States. Universität Hamburg, Working Paper, March 2021.
5. Beetsma, Roel M. W. J.; Burgoon, Brian; Nicoli, Francesco; Ruijter, Anniek de; Vandenbroucke, Frank (2020): What Kind of EU Fiscal Capacity? Evidence from a Randomized Survey Experiment in Five European Countries in Times of Corona. CESifo Working Paper No. 8470, July 2020.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献