Interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the light of politeness theory

Author:

Brzozowska Dorota1ORCID,Chłopicki Władysław2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Opole , Opole , Poland

2. Jagiellonian University , Kraków , Poland

Abstract

AbstractThe present study attempts to analyze the interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the selected exchanges from 2018 to 2019 in terms of discourse-sensitive politeness theory advanced by Jonathan Culpeper. He proposes to use three types of impoliteness that affect three types of interlocutors’ faces via a range of impoliteness strategies. In the analyses we consider the linguistic, personal, and cultural as well as political context of the exchanges against the background of the unique, historically rooted institutional circumstances, with a special emphasis on the role of different physical contexts of respective Parliamentary chambers. We emphasize the discursive nature and continuum of (im)polite/(in)appropriate behaviors. In conclusion, the study falls back on Brown and Levinson’s tradition, argued not to be incompatible with Culpeper’s system, and confirms the existence of largely negative and largely positive politeness cultures, emphasizing the prevalence of Polish formal, impersonal, sometimes also affective impoliteness in contrast to the British somewhat more person-oriented, coercive impoliteness.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics

Reference45 articles.

1. Bax, Marcel & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.). 2012. Understanding historical (Im)politeness. Relational linguistic practice over time and across cultures. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

2. Bayley, Paul (ed.). 2004. Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

3. Bercow, John. 2020. Unspeakable: The autobiography. London: W&N.

4. Bíba, Jan & Milan Znoj (eds.). 2017. A crisis of democracy and representation. Filosofický časopis / Journal of Philosophy, Special Issue 2017/1.

5. Bogdanowska-Jakubowska, Ewa. 2010. Face. An interdisciplinary perspective. Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3