Cytotoxic and apoptotic effectiveness of Cypriot honeybee (Apis mellifera cypria) venom on various cancer cells
Author:
Nalbantsoy Ayşe1ORCID, Varol Ekin2ORCID, Çaglar Ayşe Dila1ORCID, Yücel Banu2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Bioengineering Department , Ege University , Bornova , Izmir , Türkiye 2. Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science , Ege University , Bornova , Izmir , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The bee stinger is the defense organ of honeybees. The venom sac of a worker bee is connected to its stinger, which is used as a defense mechanism, and it has a potent and complex combination of substances that is unique in the animal kingdom. Many immune-related illnesses have been successfully treated with bee venom and recent evidence on the efficacy of applications targeting malignancies has attracted considerable attention.
Methods
The 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) test was used to determine the cytotoxicity of the crude venom, and the flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the apoptotic potential. The cytotoxic activity of Apis mellifera cypria venom collected from two different apiaries in Cyprus was evaluated for the first time against breast (MDA-MB-231), colon (Caco-2), cervix (HeLa), prostate (PC-3), pancreas (Panc-1), lung (A549), glioblastoma (U-87MG) human cancerous and healthy lung fibroblast (CCD-34Lu) cells.
Results
The venom concentration that killed 50 % of the cells (inhibitory concentration, IC50) is expressed as venom cytotoxicity. The IC50 values of A. m. cypria crude venom on cultured cells varied from 4.18±0.75 to 22.00±1.71 μg/mL after treatment with crude venom for 48 h, with the most potent activities against PC-3, Panc-1, and HeLa cells. Analysis of apoptotic cells by flow cytometry of both venom samples showed that bee venom slightly induced early apoptosis on A549 and Panc-1 cells.
Conclusions
The venom of the A. m. cypria is discussed in this article, displaying promising results as a potential source for an alternative treatment method because of its cytotoxic effect.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference36 articles.
1. Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, Fuchs, HE, Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022;72:7–33, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708. 2. Cwon, Y, Hjoo, K, Shun, L. Therapeutic application of diverse marine-derived natural products in cancer therapy. Anticancer Res 2019;39:5261–84, https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13721. 3. Yaacoub, C, Rifi, M, El-Obeid, D, Mawlawi, H, Sabatier, JM, Coutard, B, et al.. The cytotoxic effect of Apis mellifera venom with a synergistic potential of its two main components-melittin and PLA2-on colon cancer HCT116 cell lines. Molecules 2021;26:2264, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082264. 4. Huang, M, Lu, JJ, Ding, J. Natural products in cancer therapy: past, present and future. Nat Prod Bioprospect 2021;11:5–13, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-020-00293-7. 5. Kumar, M, Prakash, S, Radha Lorenzo, JM, Chandran, D, Dhumal, S, Dey, A, et al.. Apitherapy and periodontal disease: insights into in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Antioxidants 2022;11:823, https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050823.
|
|