Dermatology patients’ and their doctors’ representations about adherence

Author:

Szabó Csanád1,Kemény Lajos1,Csabai Márta2

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary

2. 2Institute of Psychology, University of Szeged, 6722 Szeged, Hungary

Abstract

AbstractThe aim of our study was to identify representations about patient adherence among dermatologists (N=40) and their patients (N=153). A combined qualitative-quantitative methodology was applied. Dermatologists identified good doctor-patient relationship, information from the doctor, and background information as the most important determinants of adherence. In patients’ rankings, information from the doctor and understandable communication received the highest scores. Multidimensional scaling arranged patients’ results into four content groups which helped to reveal the structure of the representations. Our results may contribute to the evidence-based confirmation that transparency of views and expectations in doctor-patient communication is a basic determinant of successful adherence.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data;Hayes;Commun Methods Meas,2007

2. Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions : scientific review;McDonald;JAMA,2002

3. I ve not asked him you see and he s not said : Understanding Lay Explanatory Models of Illness is a Prerequisite for Concordance Consultations;Pollock;Int J Pharm Pract,2001

4. A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses;Castro;Mix Methods Res,2010

5. Outcomes associated with matching patients treatment preferences to physicians recommendations : study methodology;Umar;BMC Health Serv Res,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Maximizing Treatment Compliance in Psoriasis;Updates in Clinical Dermatology;2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3