Affiliation:
1. University of Toronto Departments of Geography & Planning and Political Science Sidney Smith Hall 100 St. George Street Toronto ON M5S 3G3 Toronto Canada
2. HEC Montréal Department of International Business 3000 chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine Montréal QC H3T 2A7 Montréal Canada
Abstract
Abstract
This paper suggests that it is a timely task to aim at building better methods in economic geography. While economic geography is a vibrant field, it is characterized by methodological divides and fragmentations. In presenting a collection of five papers, we address these problems by suggesting to move forward in at least five directions: bridging the qualitative/quantitative divide, clarifying causality, selecting appropriate data, improving rigor, and ensuring high ethical standards.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference36 articles.
1. Abbott, A. 1998. The causal devolution. Sociological Methods and Research, 27(2): 148–181.
2. Barnes, T./Sheppard, E. 2010. ‘Nothing includes everything’: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2): 193–214
3. Bathelt, H./Coe, N.M./Kerr, W.R./Robert-Nicoud, F. 2017. Editorial: economic geography IMPULSES. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(5): 927–933.
4. Bathelt, H./Gibson, R. 2015: Learning in ‘organized anarchies’: the nature of technological search processes and knowledge flows at international trade fairs. Regional Studies, 49(6): 985–1002.
5. Bathelt, H./Glückler, J. 2018. Relational research design in economic geography. In G.L. Clark./M.P. Feldman/M.S. Gertler/D. Wojcik. (eds) The New Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 179–195.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献