1. Bandow, Doug (2016): South Korean Nukes: Less Risky to America than Extended Deterrence, The National Interest, 24.8. (http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-skeptics/south-korean-nukes-less-risky-america-extended-deterrence-17464).
2. Blechman, Barry M. (2009): Extended Deterrence: Cutting Edge of the Debate on Nuclear Policy, Policy Forum Online 09–066A, 13.8. (https://nautilus.org/napsnet/napsnet-policy-forum/extended-deterrence-cutting-edge-of-the-debate-on-nuclear-policy/).
3. Brands, Hal (2007): Non-Proliferation and the Dynamics of the Middle Cold War: The Superpowers, the MLF, and the NPT, Cold War History, 7 (3), 389–423.
4. Daalder, Ivo/Lodal, Jan (2008): The Logic of Zero: Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons, Foreign Affairs, 87 (6), 80–95.
5. Flores, Daniel (2014): The Credibility of Extended Deterrence and Assurance: The US Commitment to Japan. Dissertation, Stanford University, Juni 2014 (https://stacks.stanford.edu/file/druid:hp710pd1945/The%20Credibility%20of%20Extended%20Deterrence%20and%20Assurance-%20The%20US%20Commitment%20to%20Japan.pdf).