Affiliation:
1. The University of Tokyo , Tokyo , Japan
Abstract
Abstract
This paper discusses the concept of weak head in Chomsky’s (2015. Problems of projection: Extensions. In Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, 3–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins) sense from a typological perspective. This paper first establishes a novel generalization that large-scale pied-piping is available in a language only if the language has indeterminate pronouns in Kuroda’s (1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation) sense and the clause to be pied-piped is head-final. To deduce this generalization, this paper first offers a labeling theoretic account of large-scale pied-piping. It then proposes that weak heads are (i) heads that have unvalued features and (ii) morpho-phonologically weak. It is shown that the generalization is deduced from this conception of weak heads, given Inaba’s (2011. The morphosyntax of constituent ordering patterns. The Hiroshima University Studies, Graduate School of Letters 71. 43–72) generalization that head-final complementizers are generally affixal. This paper further argues that the proposed conception of weak heads also allows us to deduce Agree from Minimal Search, which is a third factor principle according to Chomsky (2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33–49), hence minimizes UG.
Reference81 articles.
1. Aldridge, Edith. 2009. Short wh-movement in Old Japanese. In Shoishi Iwasaki, Hajime Hoji, Patricia M. Clancy & Sung-Ock S. Sohn (eds.), Japanese/Korean linguistics 17, 549–563. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Langauge and Information.
2. Andrews, Avery. 2007. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II, 206–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barbosa, Pilar P. 2019. pro as a minimal nP: Toward a unified approach to pro-drop. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3). 487–526. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00312.
4. Bayer, Josef. 1996. Directionality and logical form. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Belletti, Adriana. 2001. ‘Inversion’ as focalization. In Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), Inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.