Affiliation:
1. Department of Public Administration and Sociology , Erasmus University Rotterdam .
2. Centre for Welfare and Labour Research , Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences
Abstract
Abstract
Our starting point is that a social psychological approach dominates the literature on interdependent or “linked” lives (Elder, 1994). We argue that interdependence is not only social-psychological, but is also structured on a macro-level. More specifically, we illustrate ways in which demographic change, such as increased co-longevity, creates different opportunities for interdependence for men and women. In addition, we draw attention to the role of national policies, distinguishing ways in which legislation mandates generational interdependence (e.g., legal obligations to provide financial support), blocks generational interdependence (e.g., grandparents not granted the right to raise grandchildren when parents cannot provide adequate care; migration laws not granting temporary visits to enable the provision of care), generates generational interdependence (e.g., daddy quota), and lightens generational interdependence (e.g., less reliance on grandparental care in Northern and Western Europe due to public support to parents of young children). We pay specific attention to childless men and women, questioning the primacy assigned to kinship ties in health care and long-term support policies. Gender receives consistent consideration throughout the paper.
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference68 articles.
1. Abendroth, A. K., Huffman, M. L., & Treas, J. (2014). The parity penalty in life course perspective: Motherhood and occupational status in 13 European countries. American Sociological Review, 79(5): 993–1014.10.1177/0003122414545986
2. American Bar Association (2014). Default Surrogate Consent Statutes. http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/2014_default_surrogate_consent_statutes.authcheckdam.pdf Accessed May 27, 2016
3. Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (1996). European social care services: Is it possible to identify models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2): 87-100.10.1177/095892879600600201
4. Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1): 1-16.
5. Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Econonomics, 10(1): 85-113.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献