Changing orientations to heritage language: The practice-based ideology of Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora families

Author:

Canagarajah Suresh1

Affiliation:

1. Pennsylvania State University , Pennsylvania , USA

Abstract

Abstract The notion of heritage language (HL) has recently been challenged by emerging orientations to language. That languages are always in contact, they are constructed by ideologies, and they don’t have an ontological status challenge traditional notions of HL as primordial, pure, and territorialized. In this article, I draw from data from a qualitative inquiry adopting observations, surveys, and interviews on how families of the Sri Lankan Tamil diaspora community in UK, USA, and Canada define heritage language and competence. I focus specifically on interview data to unveil the language ideologies of community members relating to heritage language and identity. For them, competence means having the ability to align Tamil verbal resources strategically with multimodal semiotic resources and spatial repertoires to accomplish social and cultural communicative activities. For this objective, being proficient in fragmentary verbal resources, receptive and/or conversational skills, low diglossic Tamil, and informal register are deemed satisfactory. Therefore the corpus that is considered as HL is also changing in diaspora contexts to accommodate appropriations from other languages, and metonymic uses, which develop shared indexicality for the community. I label these assumptions as constituting a practice-based ideology of HL. Such an orientation will help us understand HL as a socially constructed and changing construct, while affirming its importance for migrant communities.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference25 articles.

1. Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23. 231–273.

2. Atkinson, D., E. Churchill, T. Nishino, & H. Okada. 2007. Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal 91. 169–188.

3. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Trans. V.W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.

4. Bauman, Richard & Charles Briggs. 2000. Language philosophy as language ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder. In P. V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 139–204. Oxford: James Currey.

5. Blackledge, Adrian & Angela Creese. 2008. Contesting ‘language’ as ‘heritage’: Negotiation of identities in late modernity. Applied Linguistics 29(4). 533–554.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3