Educating culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities in inclusive settings: beyond debates

Author:

Obiakor Festus E.1,Aluka Innocent J.2,Obiakor Gina Chioma3,Obi Sunday O.4

Affiliation:

1. Sunny Educational Consulting , Shorewood , WI , USA

2. Arts and Sciences , Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View A & M University , TX , USA

3. Health Policy and Management , Loma Linda University , Loma Linda , CA , USA

4. School of Education , Kentucky State University , Frankfort , KY , USA

Abstract

Abstract Inclusive and equitable education is the ultimate tool to develop students, communities, and the general society. And, special education is an added tool to help atypical and vulnerable students to be productive citizens in a thriving society. Ceteris paribus, for many culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students with disabilities, being educated in an inclusive environment should be the ideal policy. However, it is not! Inclusion has continued to be debatable, challenged, and controversial, making this ideal goal implausible and unrealistic. Coupled with their disabilities, CLD students experience the loaded problems of discrimination, racism, and xenophobia in the multidimensional forms of misidentification, misassessment, mislabeling/miscategorization, misplacement, and misinstruction. These multiple problems make it easy for general and special education professionals and service providers to (a) view placement as instruction, (b) focus on unidimensional and narrow confines, and (b) intentionally, unintentionally, or inaccurately judge CLD students’ capabilities and willingness to maximize their fullest potential. The question then is, since the goal is to increase “normalcy” in the lives of CLD students with disabilities, is it not important to equitably educate them with their “normal” peers in inclusive settings? This article responds to this question.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference44 articles.

1. Allan, J. (2003). Productive pedagogies and the challenge of inclusion. British Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2003.00307.x.

2. Artiles, A. J., Harris-Murri, N., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764121-8.

3. Banks, T., Obiakor, F. E., & Rotatori, A. F. (2021). Enhancing partnerships in special education: Innovative collaboration, consultation, and cooperation. Information Age.

4. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. (1954). Case, 347 U.S.483.

5. Causton-Theoharis, J., & Theoharis, G. (2008). Creating inclusive schools for all students. The School Administrator, 65(8), 24–25.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Language at the Crossroads of Inclusion;Advances in Psychology, Mental Health, and Behavioral Studies;2024-09-13

2. Strategies to enhance the inclusion of culturally and linguistically diverse learners in Gauteng schools: Teachers’ perspectives;South African Journal of Education;2024-08-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3