Educating culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities in inclusive settings: beyond debates
Author:
Obiakor Festus E.1, Aluka Innocent J.2, Obiakor Gina Chioma3, Obi Sunday O.4
Affiliation:
1. Sunny Educational Consulting , Shorewood , WI , USA 2. Arts and Sciences , Prairie View A & M University, Prairie View A & M University , TX , USA 3. Health Policy and Management , Loma Linda University , Loma Linda , CA , USA 4. School of Education , Kentucky State University , Frankfort , KY , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Inclusive and equitable education is the ultimate tool to develop students, communities, and the general society. And, special education is an added tool to help atypical and vulnerable students to be productive citizens in a thriving society. Ceteris paribus, for many culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students with disabilities, being educated in an inclusive environment should be the ideal policy. However, it is not! Inclusion has continued to be debatable, challenged, and controversial, making this ideal goal implausible and unrealistic. Coupled with their disabilities, CLD students experience the loaded problems of discrimination, racism, and xenophobia in the multidimensional forms of misidentification, misassessment, mislabeling/miscategorization, misplacement, and misinstruction. These multiple problems make it easy for general and special education professionals and service providers to (a) view placement as instruction, (b) focus on unidimensional and narrow confines, and (b) intentionally, unintentionally, or inaccurately judge CLD students’ capabilities and willingness to maximize their fullest potential. The question then is, since the goal is to increase “normalcy” in the lives of CLD students with disabilities, is it not important to equitably educate them with their “normal” peers in inclusive settings? This article responds to this question.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference44 articles.
1. Allan, J. (2003). Productive pedagogies and the challenge of inclusion. British Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-3383.2003.00307.x. 2. Artiles, A. J., Harris-Murri, N., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Inclusion as social justice: Critical notes on discourses, assumptions, and the road ahead. Theory Into Practice, 45(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764121-8. 3. Banks, T., Obiakor, F. E., & Rotatori, A. F. (2021). Enhancing partnerships in special education: Innovative collaboration, consultation, and cooperation. Information Age. 4. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. (1954). Case, 347 U.S.483. 5. Causton-Theoharis, J., & Theoharis, G. (2008). Creating inclusive schools for all students. The School Administrator, 65(8), 24–25.
|
|