A tale of two tool(kit)s: from canonical antonymy to non-canonical opposition in the Qur’anic discourse

Author:

Hassanein Hamada12

Affiliation:

1. Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University , Alkharj , Saudi Arabia

2. Mansoura University , Mansoura , Egypt

Abstract

Abstract A number of discourse functions of canonical antonyms have been quantified and classified in English and across languages, each of which is associated with typical syntactic frames. Taking such a classification of canonical antonymy as an analytical toolkit, (Davies, Matt. 2012. A new approach to oppositions in discourse: the role of syntactic frames in the triggering of noncanonical oppositions. Journal of English Linguistics 40(1). 41–73) quantified and qualified the role of these frames in triggering non-canonical oppositions in English news discourse. Synergizing the provisional typologies of canonical antonymy (Hassanein, Hamada. 2018. Discourse functions of opposition in Classical Arabic: The case in ḥadīth genre. Lingua 201. 18–44; Jones, Steven. 2002. Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London and New York: Routledge.) and non-canonical opposition (Davies, Matt. 2012. A new approach to oppositions in discourse: the role of syntactic frames in the triggering of noncanonical oppositions. Journal of English Linguistics 40(1). 41–73), this study has sought to develop a dynamic toolkit for the quantitative and qualitative analyses of non-canonical opposition across Arabic varieties and potentially other languages. The toolkit was tested quantitatively and qualitatively against a dataset of 2125 non-canonical oppositional pairs collected from the Qur’an with reference to the Qur’anic Arabic Corpus. Results showed that the syntactic frames which house a wide range of co-occurring canonical antonyms also house a wider range of non-canonical oppositions in binary and trinary representations of abstract and concrete entities. The role of syntactic frames in the triggering of non-canonical oppositions is quantitatively and qualitatively significant for locating and explicating the ideological repercussions of oppositions towards Qur’an interpretation. It is concluded that a synergy of typologies results in a replicable pathway for analysis.

Funder

Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Reference60 articles.

1. ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz al-Ǧurǧānī, ʿAlī. 1966. Al-wasāṭah bayna al-Mutanabbī wa-ḫuṣūmih. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat ʿĪsā.

2. Abdel Haleem, Muhammad. 2004. The Qur’an: A new translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Akşehirli, Soner. 2018. Ancillary antonymy in Turkish. Journal of Language Education and Research 4(1). 41–60.

4. Al-Buḫārī, Muḥammad. 1981. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

5. AlHedayani, Rukayah. 2016. Antonymy in modern standard Arabic. Sussex: University of Sussex PhD dissertation.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3