From verb to epistemic marker: <i>bini</i> in Hamedanian Persian-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

From verb to epistemic marker: bini in Hamedanian Persian

Published:2023-07-24 Issue:3 Volume:59 Page:635-645
ISSN:0137-2459
Container-title:Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Rasekh-Mahand Mohammad¹,Sabouri Fariba¹

Affiliation:

1. Linguistics Department , Bu-Ali Sina University , Hamedan , Iran

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides data from a regional dialect of Persian, Hamedanian Persian, where a verb is grammaticalized to be used as epistemic modality marker, frequently used in interrogatives. The verb didan, objectively means ‘to see’, but subjectivized in many instances to mean ‘understand’. However, in this dialect, bini, originally the subjunctive second person singular form of the verb didan ‘to see’, is used as epistemic marker. It is used in content and polar questions, where uncertainty is a common feature. Our fieldwork data show that the verb didan is used rarely to mean ‘to see’ and it extended to mark epistemic modality, used as probability marker. This modal marker is only used in questions, which share the stance of uncertainty with epistemic markers. The various features of this grammaticalization path are discussed and an explanation based on egophoricity is provided.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/psicl-2023-0007/pdf

Reference19 articles.

1. Bavin, Edith L. 1995. The obligation modality in Western Nilotic languages. In Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

2. Beijering, Karin. 2012. Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian. A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface, vol. 106. Groningen: University of Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics.

3. Bencini, Giulia. 2003. Toward a diachronic typology of yes/no question constructions with particles. In David W. Kaiser, Jonathan E. Cihlar, Amy L. Franklin & Irene Kimbara (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 39. The Main Session, 604–621. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

4. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

5. Grady, Joseph. 1997. Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California Dissertations. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2.