Abstract
Abstract
I argue that the adjective δαιμόνιος (‘daemonic’) and the substantivized adjective τὸ δαιμόνιον (‘the daemonic’) that occur in Aristotle’s dream treatises basically mean ‘divine-like,’ denoting an illusory appearance of divine intervention, typically in the form of an alleged god-sent prophetic dream. Yet the appearances to which the terms refer are, in fact, neither divine nor supernatural at all, but involve merely coincidental correlations between the dream and the fulfilling event. It is shown that Aristotle’s use of ‘daemonic’ is traditional and reflects the endoxon that prophetic dreams are closely related to the divine. The paper also examines a set of earlier readings of the daemonic in De divinatione in relation to the proposed interpretation.
Reference41 articles.
1. Aristotle. 1908/1928. The Works of Aristotle. Vol. VIII, Metaphysica. Ed. and trans. W. D. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. —. 1957. On the Soul, Parva Naturalia, On Breath. Trans. W. S. Hett. Loeb Classic Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Bodéüs, R. 2000. Aristotle and the Theology of the Living Immortals. Trans. J. E. Garrett. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Bos, A. P. 1989. Cosmic and Meta-Cosmic Theology in Aristotle’s Lost Dialogues. Leiden: Brill.