Affiliation:
1. University of Groningen Faculty of Philosophy, Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712 GL Groningen NL
Abstract
Abstract
As a rule, the Kantian capacity for self-control is interpreted as a kind of tool for compelling ourselves to act on the basis of the maxims we have adopted. To the extent that we merely acknowledge its role in following already-adopted maxims, however, we fail to capture the distinctive aspect of moral self-control identified by Kant. In this paper, I propose a fuller account of the Kantian capacity for moral self-control; I do so mainly by analyzing this capacity as our ability to “abstract from” various sensible impressions. This analysis shows that Kant’s conception of moral self-control involves two intimately related levels, which are subject to different criteria. Whereas the first level is connected to our ability to adopt moral maxims and requires that we abstract from all sensible impressions, the second is associated with our ability to follow these maxims and does not necessarily require this radical abstraction.
Reference18 articles.
1. Allison, H. E. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge.
2. Baxley, A. M. 2003. “Autocracy and Autonomy”. Kant-Studien 94, 1–23.
3. –. 2010. Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge.
4. Denis, L. 2000. “Kant’s Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy”. Kantian Review 4, 48–73.
5. Engstrom, S. 2002. “The Inner Freedom of Virtue”. In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Ed. Mark Timmons. Oxford, 289–315.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Kant on Self-Control;2024-05-28
2. Kant’s Conception of Moral Strength;Canadian Journal of Philosophy;2020-01-22
3. Kant's account of moral weakness;European Journal of Philosophy;2018-08-13