Disambiguating Philippine Republic Acts: the case of RA 10913

Author:

Bernardo Alejandro S.1ORCID,Albaña-Garrido Angeli P.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of English, Research Center for Social Sciences and Education , University of Santo Tomas , Manila , The Philippines

2. Supreme Court of the Philippines , Branch 32, Metropolitan Trial Court – Quezon City , The Philippines

Abstract

AbstractThis paper analyzes the ambiguities in a Republic Act (RA) promulgated in the Philippines as its way of contributing to the gradually growing number of forensic and legal linguistics research in the country. In particular, it aims to disambiguate the different categories of ambiguities, e.g., lexical, semantic, syntactic, referential, cross-textual and pragmatic, in Republic Act 10913 or the Anti-Distracted Driving Act enacted in 2016. Following a purely qualitative design and a predominantly theoretical approach in the analysis of the ambiguities in the said Republic Act, this paper hopes to offer a potential source of guidance to minimize difficult issues pertinent to the interpretation of the law. This paper also attempts to discuss the basic rationale behind the choice or presence of ambiguous language in a setting such as the drafting of RA 10913 and proposes that there be a ‘cross-fertilization’ between the readings of legal drafters and linguists.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Law,Linguistics and Language

Reference55 articles.

1. Aalto-Heinila, Maija. 2016. Fairness in statutory interpretation: Text, purpose or intention? International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(1). 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0004.

2. Abiola, Kalejaiye, Barrister Buduka Isaac Otagiri & Idowu A. Olubunmi. 2019. Ambiguities in the language of law. A case study of selected court cases in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 8(9). 53–59.

3. Adams, Kenneth A. & Allan S. Kaye. 2007. Revisiting the ambiguity of “and” and “or” in legal drafting. St. John’s Law Review 80(4). 1167–1198.

4. Agabin, Pacifico. 2018. Taking text and structure seriously: Two approaches to constitutional interpretation. [Paper Presentation]. Tagaytay City: PHILJA Training Center.

5. Allen, Layman. 1957. Symbolic logic: A razor-edged tool for drafting and interpreting legal documents. Yale Law Journal 66(6). 833–879.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3