Affiliation:
1. Münster Germany
2. Universität Göttingen , Seminar für Deutsche Philologie, Käte-Hamburger-Weg 3, Göttingen , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
The article reconstructs the theory of political storytelling as outlined by political strategist Mark McKinnon. Stories that conform to this theory feature a suspense structure, and as such they invoke hope and fear in recipients, thereby instilling pro- or contra-attitudes. This is potentially problematic in four respects: Political storytelling (1) can be used to induce attitude-change without a rational foundation, thereby infringing on the receiver’s right to epistemic self-determination; (2) political storytelling may involve a misrepresentation of the teller’s communicative intentions, thereby disclosing the truth about them in a way that is potentially harmful to society; (3) by expressing rather than stating crucial elements of his or her “message,” the political storyteller may immunize him- or herself from critique and mask the true content of the message; (4) by attempting to influence recipients’ preferences, the political storyteller does not conform to some fundamental principle of representative democracy.
Reference31 articles.
1. Bakir, Vian, Eric Henning, David Miller & Piers Robinson. 2019. Lying and deception in politics. In Jörg Meibauer (ed.), The Oxford handbook of lying, 529–540. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bálint, Katalin, Moniek M. Kuijpers & Miruna M. Doicaru. 2017. The effect of suspense structure on felt suspense and narrative absorption. In Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint & Miruna M. Doicaru (eds.), Narrative absorption, 177–197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Baumann, Peter. 2000. Die Autonomie der Person. Paderborn: Mentis.
4. Carroll, Noël. 1996. Theorizing the moving image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Carroll, Noël: 2001. Beyond aesthetics. Philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.