Abstract
Abstract
Kenneth Burke’s dramatistic pentad can be understood as a pentadic model of semiotic analysis. Dyadic, triadic, and other relational models offer valuable benefits, but Burke’s pentad is especially useful and relevant given its focus on both action and motive/purpose. Here we will look in more detail at some of these benefits of Burke’s schema understood in this semiotic light, and then we’ll apply the model to a few examples of object analysis. If it is true that Burke’s pentad works in this way as well as we think it does, then fruitful ground exists here for other researchers as well, particularly since Burke’s pentadic model features much less in the field of semiotics proper than do more common dyadic and triadic based models.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference16 articles.
1. Opposition theory and the interconnectedness of language, culture, and cognition;Sign Systems Studies,2009
2. When agents become expressive: A theory of semiotic agency;Cognitive Semiotics,2007
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Pengaruh Pendidikan Kesehatan Terhadap Perilaku Seksual Pada Remaja;Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research;2023-09-30