Affiliation:
1. University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics Subotica, Serbia
Abstract
Abstract
Leadership is a topic that attracts the attention of a large number of scientists and researchers who in their papers examine the issues of effective leadership. During previous research in this area different methodologies were used, but in recent decades one of the most prominent is MLQ questionnaire (Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire - MLQ), which examines three styles of leadership: transformational, transactional and passive leadership. The paper analyses the predominating attitudes in this area, theoretical explanation of MLQ questionnaire components and empirical results of previous applications. Founded on the obtained theoretical basis, the paper suggests future research framework in order to examine implementation of certain leadership styles from the MLQ questionnaire depending on the business environment which can vary from stable to uncertain, as well as their relationship with the achieved level of firm innovativeness. Thus, the aim of this paper is to define research framework that will be applied in a future research on an adequate sample of medium and large companies on the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Reference36 articles.
1. Antonakis J., Avolio B. & Sivasubramaniam N. (2003). Context and leadership: an examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(3), 261-295.
2. Bass B. M. (1985) Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. New York
3. Bass B. M. & Avolio B. J. (1993) Transformational leadership, response to critiques in: Leadership theory and research perspectives and directions. Academic Press. New York, 49-80.
4. Bass, B. M. & Avolio B. J. (2004) Multifactor leadership questionnaire - MLQ self-evaluation. Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden. 5-9.
5. Bass, B. M. (1997) Does the transactional-transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52, 130−139.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献