Affiliation:
1. Le Mans University , Le Mans , France
Abstract
Abstract
It is widely considered that a (perfectly) competitive equilibrium cannot survive to the existence of fixed costs because firms generate losses in equilibrium. In this theoretical and methodological article, I demonstrate that this statement is not valid by developing some counter-examples. In particular, I clearly show that a competitive equilibrium and fixed costs are tenable, depending on the ownership structure of models. I then delimit the role of fixed costs in macroeconomic models. Notably, I find that fixed costs can improve the level of aggregate output in the long run.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference20 articles.
1. Boitier, V. 2020. “Growth and Ideas in a Perfectly Competitive World.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 53: 370–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.06.002.
2. Boitier, V. 2021. “Growth and Ideas in a Perfectly Competitive World: A Complement.” Economics and Business Letters 10: 157–63. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.10.2.2021.157-163.
3. Boitier, V. 2023. “Ownership Structure and Profit Maximization in General Equilibrium Models with Market Power.” Economics and Business Letters 12: 85–90. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.12.1.2023.85-90.
4. Boitier, V., and A. Payen de La Garanderie. 2022 In preparation. Monopolistic Competition, Free Entry and General Equilibrium: A Reappraisal. Le Mans: Le Mans University.
5. Brown, D. J. 1991. In Equilibrium Analysis with Nonconvex Technologies, Handbook of Mathematical Economics, edited by W. Hildenbrand, and H. Sonnenschein. Amsterdam: North-Holland.