On inadequacies in transferring concepts from one to another (linguistic sub)discipline

Author:

Dressler Wolfgang U.1

Affiliation:

1. Dept. of Linguistics, Vienna University and Institute for Corpus Linguistics and Text Technology, Austrian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Abstract The paper discusses several methodological problems in the necessary (mostly metaphorical) transfer of concepts from one discipline (or subdiscipline) into another one, especially when interdisciplinary research demands mutual understanding in terms of translation and correspondence of concepts. After differentiating between multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity, the first is rejected and it is pleaded that the second and third should be combined. Several adequate and inadequate transfers of concepts into linguistics are dealt with, especially in the areas of morphology and language acquisition. Successful transfer is characterised by the formal transfer of new terms and their easy adaptation to already existing linguistic conceptions, especially between subdisciplines. Most often, further important differentiations of a concept cannot be transferred from the original discipline but must be added as enrichments within linguistics itself. This may lead to a split-up of concepts in different subdisciplines of linguistics. The concepts discussed are regression, self-organization, complexity, transparency vs. opacity, figure and ground, top-down processing, default, input, grammaticalisation.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference72 articles.

1. Andersen, E.S. 1992. “Complexity and language acquisition influences on the development of morphological systems in children”. In: Hawkins, J.A. and M. Gell Mann (eds.), Proceedings of Workshop on Evolution of Human Languages. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 241–272.

2. Anthony, D.W. and D. Ringe. 2015. “The Indo-European homeland from linguistic and archeological perspectives”. Annual Review of Linguistics 2015(1). 199–219.

3. Baudouin de Courtenay, J.1869. “Einige Beobachtungen zu Kindern”. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Sprachforschung 6. 215–220.

4. Bavin, E.L. 2009. The Cambridge handbook of child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Behrens, H. 2008 (ed.). Corpora in language acquisition research. History, methods, perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3