Semiotics and political discourse in the post-truth era

Author:

Çanakpınar Betül1ORCID,Kalelioğlu Murat2ORCID,Günay V. Doğan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Istinye University , Istanbul , Türkiye

2. School of Foreign Languages , T C Mardin Artuklu University , Mardin , Türkiye

3. Faculty of Literature, Department of Linguistics , Dokuz Eylül University , Izmir , Türkiye

Abstract

Abstract The concept of post-truth has been on the world’s agenda since 2016. Perhaps this concept, which is frequently encountered in political life, provides the speaker with a freer speaking platform. Politicians, instead of presenting the reality to their constituents as it is, want to reshape this reality according to their own ideology and present it to the recipient. Politicians have certain objectives in creating such a virtual reality. These aims can be listed as keeping the voters, increasing the voting potential, and attracting undecided voters to their favor. The common result of all these aims is to gain political power or to remain in the existing power. Post-truth reality is constructed relatively more easily in social media environments. The construction of reality can be through beliefs or emotions. In such ways, the recipient is tried to be persuaded, and thus behavioral change is achieved. One of the most necessary subjects for this artificial reality atmosphere is the anti-subject. The idea that the anti-subject does not know the truth that we (you and I) know and believe and is trying to destroy it is the main theme of post-truth discourse. Politicians try to persuade the voters to believe in their own truth by expressing this idea to them. There are many examples of this around the world. In this study, firstly, the concept of post-truth is examined and its various definitions are discussed. The distinctions between the concepts of real and truth are analyzed and then it is explained how and for what purposes the concept of post-truth is used in politics. Following the comparison of post-truth and fake news, the concept is discussed within the framework of sender-receiver interaction in terms of communication. The concept is tried to be elucidated with the modalities such as /convincing/, /believing/, /being/, /appearing/. Besides, using the semiotic square, the study also tries to reveal the different purposes and forms of use of the concept of post-truth. As a result, it has been observed that the concept of post-truth is effective in many areas of contemporary societies, and rather than real information, expected and desired information has become more important.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference26 articles.

1. ABC News. 2020. Trump has longstanding history of calling elections ‘rigged’ if he doesn’t like the results. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-longstanding-history-calling-elections-rigged-doesnt-results/story?id=74126926 (accessed November 2023).

2. Alpay, Yalın. 2019. Yalanın iyaseti. İstanbul: Destek Yayınları.

3. Angermuller, Johannes. 2018. Truth after post-truth: or a Strong Programme in Discourse Studies. Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, 4(1). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0080-1.

4. Baudrillard, Jean. 2014. Simülakrlar ve imülasyon. Oğuz Adanır (çev.) 9. Basım, Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları.

5. Bizzocchi, Aldo. 2014. Modalités épistémiques et modalités doxiques: Aspects idéologico-sémiotiques des processus cognitifs. https://www.academia.edu/8998871 (accessed 28 Ağustos 2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3