Affiliation:
1. Beijing Normal University , School of Philosophy , 19 Xinwai Ave, Beitaipingzhuang, Hai Dian Qu, Bei Jing Shi, China China , Beijing 47836 Beijing Normal University
Abstract
Abstract
This paper examines the work of one of Russia’s greatest philosophers, Vladimir Solovyov (1853–1900), from the perspective of natural theology and attempts to distil the original natural theological arguments which we find in his work. Solovyov’s arguments are rarely presented in clarity or with a detailed critical analysis. The current paper thus hopes to offer some amendment to this unfortunate deficiency in the secondary literature. It will become evident that Solovyov’s relation to natural theology contained two distinct layers. There is, on the one hand, the external polemical and publicist layer of discourse, where Solovyov rejects natural theology outright. On the other hand, there is the deeper metaphysical layer, where Solovyov’s own arguments, hidden within his elaborate metaphysical structures, can themselves be considered as a form of natural theology. The paper will conclude that, despite the overall failure of his arguments, Solovyov can still provide inspiration for Orthodox theologians by attempting a form of natural theology within an Orthodox context.
Reference43 articles.
1. Alston, William. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.
2. Bakhurst, David. “Idealism in Russia.” In The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945, edited by Thomas Baldwin, 60–66. Cambridge: CUP, 2008.
3. Balfour, Arthur James, Theism and Humanism. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1915.
4. Beilby, James, ed. Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
5. Bourget, David and David Chalmers “What do philosophers believe?” Philosophical Studies 170 (2014): 465–500.