Author:
Eklund Dan-Johan Sebastian
Abstract
Summary
In the recent discussion, several authors have argued for the claim that propositional faith need not be doxastic, but also can be “non-doxastic”. Notable proponents of this view are William Alston, Robert Audi, Daniel Howard-Snyder, and J. L. Schellenberg. In this paper, I focus on Christian faith and consider whether its cognitive aspect can be understood solely in terms of Alston’s and others’ non-doxastic accounts. I argue for a negative answer. In my view, the cognitive aspect of Christian faith calls for, as a minimum, “a sub-doxastic attitude”. As there is no shared terminology on this topic, a proportion of this paper deals with conceptual clarifications.
Subject
Philosophy,Religious studies
Reference86 articles.
1. Faith, Doubt and Hope or Does Faith Entail Belief?;The Existence of God.,2003
2. Replies to my colleagues;Religious Studies Vol. 49 No. 2,2013b
3. In Defence of the Belief-plus Model of Faith;European Journal for Philosophy of Religion Vol. 8 No. 2,,2016
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献