Author:
Dzhumashev Ratbek,Cooray Arusha
Abstract
AbstractFeldstein-Horioka hypothesis states that if there is perfect capital mobility, low correlation between domestic investment and savings should be observed. However, empirical analysis failed to confirm the hypothesis. This study attempts to shed a new light on international capital mobility by incorporating the effect of the fiscal balance and the financial balance. Specifically, for a panel of 161 countries over the 1990–2013 period, the extended model is tested in comparison with the existing models of capital mobility. At the aggregate level, strong support is found for the extended model; while, at the region disaggregated level, compared to the existing models the hypothesis of capital mobility holds for a larger number of regions. Our model and estimates are additionally extended to account for the fact that the above mentioned relationships, are conditional on the country’s level of financial development.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference86 articles.
1. What Do Savings-Investment Relationships Tell us about Capital Mobility?;Journal of International Money and Finance,1990
2. Solving the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle with Frictions;Econometrica,2010
3. The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle revisited: A Monte-Carlo study;Journal of International Money and Finance,2005
4. Why is Capital so Immobile Internationally? Possible Explanations and Implications for Capital Income Taxation;American Economic Review,1996
5. International Capital Mobility: Evidence from Panel Data;Journal of International Money and Finance,1996
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献