Abstract
Abstract
For money to be essential, environments have been considered in which there is imperfect monitoring of past actions and in which it is difficult to coordinate among economic agents. This paper provides an environment in which there is no monitoring of past actions while coordination is difficult. In this environment, we show that the first best allocation is achieved without money, and hence, money is not essential. The implication is that, for money to be essential, no monitoring is not enough but coordination must also be free.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference52 articles.
1. Social Norms and Community Enforcement;Review of Economic Studies,1992
2. The Coordination Value of Monetary Exchange: Experimental Evidence;American Economic Journal: Microeconomics,2014
3. The Two-Money Theorem;International Economic Review,2002
4. The Essentiality of Money in Environments with Centralized Trade;Journal of Monetary Economics,2012
5. Contagion Equilibria in a Monetary Model;Econometrica,2007a