Affiliation:
1. University of New Hampshire , Department of Economics , 10 Garrison Av , Durham , 03824 , NH , USA
Abstract
Abstract
International trade fell in South Africa from the 1970s to the mid-1990s, and climbed fast thereafter, coinciding with the imposition and later removal of apartheid sanctions. Productivity followed suit. This paper explores the extent to which the increase in trade can account for the increase in productivity after apartheid. I use a model of international trade with innovation and calibrate it to match key macroeconomic variables. Non-tariff barriers, mostly related to apartheid sanctions, account for over half the changes in aggregate productivity. Tariffs play a very minor role, in line with existing studies.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference36 articles.
1. Atkeson, A., and A. T.Burstein. 2010. “Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade.” Journal of Political Economy 118(3): 433–84, https://doi.org/10.1086/653690.
2. Aw, B. Y., M. J.Roberts, and D. Y.Xu. 2008. “R&D Investments, Exporting, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity.” American Economic Review 98(2): 451–56, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.451.
3. Axtell, R. L.2001. “Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes.” Science 293(5536): 1818–20, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062081.
4. Bell, T.1993. “Should South Africa Further Liberalise its Foreign Trade?.” In: State and Market in Post Apartheid South Africa, edited by M.Lipton, and C.Simkins. South Africa: Witwatersrand University Press.
5. Bell, T.1997. “Trade Policy.” In: The Political Economy of South Africa's Transition: Policy Perspectives in the Late 1990s, edited by J.Michie. New York: Dryden Press.