Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Social Sciences and Education, Institute of Governments and Politics, Centre for Baltic Studies University of Tartu, Estonia
Abstract
Abstract
This article evaluates the significance of Russian soft power in Estonia, particularly in connection to the minority issue, and compares this soft power to the countervailing pull of the European Union on the other side. It concludes that although Russia does indeed have a number of soft power resources, their potential for being translated into actual power and influence is too often exaggerated, not least because Europe provides a much more attractive focus point for the disgruntled than Moscow. Moreover, Estonia has it fully within its power to bolster its own attractiveness in the eyes of the minority populations. Thus, although relations with Russia should be handled with care, it is not Russia’s soft power that should be feared.
Reference46 articles.
1. Amnesty International (2006), Linguistic Minorities in Estonia: Discrimination Must End, available at http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR51/002/2006/en, (last accessed on 4 November 2015).
2. Berg, E. & Boman, J. (eds) (2005), Crossborder Cooperation in Focus: What are the Lessons to be Learned in the Estonian-Russian and Romanian-Moldovan Borderland? (Tartu, Tartu University Press).
3. Brüggemann, K. & Kasekamp, A. (2008), ‘The Politics of History and the War of Memories in Estonia’, Nationalities Papers, 36, 3, pp. 425 - 448.
4. Crandall, M. (2014), ‘Soft Security Threats and Small States: the Case of Estonia’, Defence Studies, 14, 1, pp. 30-55.
5. Crowther, W. E., Matonyte, I. (2007), ‘Parliamentary elites as a democratic thermometer: Estonia, Lithuania and Moldova compared’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40, pp. 281-299.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献