Affiliation:
1. Department of Language and Culture , Purchase College , Purchase , NY , USA
2. CNRS - Université de Lille , Lille , France
Abstract
AbstractThis paper argues that <ser‘to be’ + past participle> constructions with subject-experiencer psychological verbs are adjectival passives, contra the received view that <ser + past participle> constructions are verbal passives across the board. We put forth a battery of morphological, syntactic and semantic tests to support our claim. The divide, we argue, is based on the individual-level/stage-level distinction, rather than on the lexical category of the participle. We provide a theoretical, aspect-based account that generates the distribution ofser andestarin verbal and adjectival participles and paves the way for a comprehensive analysis of theserandestardistribution across other constructions where the alternation is attested, such as underived adjectives and prepositions.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference52 articles.
1. Arche, María J. 2012. A note on the individual-level/stage-level dichotomy: How aspectual is it? Borealis, An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(2). 109–132. https://doi.org/10.7557/1.1.2.2385.
2. Arche, María J. 2006. Individuals in time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Arche, María J., Antonio Fábregas & Rafael Marín. 2017. Towards a unified treatment of Spanish copulas. In Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar & Adriana Soto-Corominas (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory, vol. 11, 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson & Ian Roberts. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 219–251.
5. Beas, Omar. 2003. Voice and v* in Spanish: The case of ser-passives and estar + past participle constructions. In Proceedings of the WECOL. Fresno, CA: California State University at Fresno.