Affiliation:
1. Università Ca’ Foscari , Venezia , Italy
Abstract
Abstract
If cross-linguistic word order variation is a function of the movement of the head of each (sub)projection of an extended projection (in one of the possible ways movement can take place: with or without pied piping) there will be novel evidence for the correct constituencies of the clause and its major phrases. Here I will try to illustrate this by looking at two specific sub-projections of the nominal extended projection in a number of Romance languages: the sub-projection of locative adverbs and elevation and exteriority/interiority particles, and the sub-projection containing ‘other’, and ordinal and cardinal numerals.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference48 articles.
1. Bernstein, Judy B. 1997. Demonstratives and reinforcers in Romance and Germanic languages. Lingua 102. 87–113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384196000460. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(96)00046-0.
2. Biloa, Edmond. 2013. The syntax of Tuki: A cartographic approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
3. Botwinik-Rotem, Irena. 2008. Why are they different? An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs. In Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds.), Syntax and semantics of spatial P, 331–364. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Bril, Isabelle. 2004. Deixis in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia). In Gunter Senft (ed.), Deixis and demonstratives in Oceanic languages, 99–127. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
5. Brugè, Laura. 1996. Demonstrative movement in Spanish: A comparative approach. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6(1). 1–53. http://lear.unive.it/jspui/handle/11707/477.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On Linearization;LINGUIST INQ MONOGR;2023-03-07