Affiliation:
1. Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
This is an introduction to the Special Issue Lexical constraints in grammar: Minority verb classes and restricted alternations. In many languages, grammatical relations are subject to lexical constraints. These constraints can be manifested in different morphosyntactic domains, for instance, through deviation from canonical case frames or different argument indexation patterns. Other constructions that have been studied through this lens are voice and valency constructions and some clause-combining constructions. The types of oppositions established by lexical constraints vary: some absolute restrictions entail the obligatory presence or absence of a grammatical marker, while others entail the ability of a lexical item to alternate. In the latter instance, differences in the statistical preferences for one construction over another may be observed. In some cases, verb classes can be easily identified based on a common semantic feature; however, various other factors can also lead to the formation of minority verb classes and restrictions on alternations. This article introduces a collection of four articles investigating lexical constraints in a variety of morphosyntactic domains, adopting different perspectives and methodologies. It sets out a framework for considering different opposition types formed by the differing behaviour of different verb classes and outlines a number of different factors that motivate the formation of verb classes. This introductory article shows that lexical constraints provide fertile ground for typologists adopting a token-based approach seeking to compare languages at ever-greater levels of specification.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference68 articles.
1. Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon, and Masayuki Onishi (eds.). 2001. Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2. Antomo, Mailin and Markus Steinbach. 2010. “Desintegration und interpretation: Weil-V2-Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29(1), 1–37.
3. Bickel, Balthasar. 2010. “Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage.” In Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmantics, edited by Isabelle Bril, p. 51–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4. Bickel, Balthasar. 2015. “Distributional typology: Statistical inquiries into the dynamics of linguistic diversity.” In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, edited by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, p. 901–23. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Taras Zakharko, and Giorgio Iemmolo. 2015. “Exploring diachronic universals of agreement: Alignment patterns and zero marking across person categories.” In Agreement from a diachronic perspective, edited by Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken, and Paul Widmer, p. 29–52. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.