Affiliation:
1. CONICET , Buenos Aires University , Argentina ; Center Leo Apostel and Foundations of the Exact Sciences , Brussels Free University , Belgium
Abstract
Abstract
In this paper we provide a general account of the causal models which attempt to provide a solution to the famous measurement problem of Quantum Mechanics (QM). We will argue that—leaving aside instrumentalism which restricts the physical meaning of QM to the algorithmic prediction of measurement outcomes—the many interpretations which can be found in the literature can be distinguished through the way they model the measurement process, either in terms of the efficient cause or in terms of the final cause. We will discuss and analyze why both, ‘final cause’ and ‘efficient cause’ models, face severe difficulties to solve the measurement problem. In contradistinction to these schemes we will present a new model based on the immanent cause which, we will argue, provides an intuitive understanding of the measurement process in QM.
Reference62 articles.
1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Potencialities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2. Aristotle. 1995. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. by J. Barnes. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
3. Bacciagaluppi, Guido. 1995. Kochen-Specker theorem in the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 34: 1205–16.10.1007/BF00676230
4. Bacciagaluppi, Guido. 1996. Topics in the Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
5. Bacciagaluppi, Guido; and Dickson, Michael. 1997. Dynamics for density operator interpretations of quantum theory. Preprint. (quant-ph/arXiv:quantph/9711048)
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献