When are Purely Predictive Models Best?

Author:

Northcott Robert1

Affiliation:

1. Birkbeck College , University of London

Abstract

Abstract Can purely predictive models be useful in investigating causal systems? I argue “yes”. Moreover, in many cases not only are they useful, they are essential. The alternative is to stick to models or mechanisms drawn from well-understood theory. But a necessary condition for explanation is empirical success, and in many cases in social and field sciences such success can only be achieved by purely predictive models, not by ones drawn from theory. Alas, the attempt to use theory to achieve explanation or insight without empirical success therefore fails, leaving us with the worst of both worlds—neither prediction nor explanation. Best go with empirical success by any means necessary. I support these methodological claims via case studies of two impressive feats of predictive modelling: opinion polling of political elections, and weather forecasting.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Philosophy

Reference34 articles.

1. Abramowitz, Alan. 2008. It’s about time: forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election with the time-for-change model. International Journal of Forecasting 24: 209–17.10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.02.002

2. Alexandrova, Anna. 2008. Making models count. Philosophy of Science 75: 383–404.10.1086/592952

3. Alexandrova, Anna; and Northcott, Robert. 2009. Progress in economics. In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Bechtold, Peter; Koehler, Martin; Jung, Thomas; Doblas-Reyes, Francisco; Leutbecher, Martin; Rodwell, Mark; Vitart, Frederic; and Balsamo, Gianpaolo. 2008. Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: from synoptic to decadal time-scales. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 134: 1337–51. (ECMWF Technical Memorandum No 556)

5. Bechtold, Peter; Bauer, Peter; Berrisford, Paul; Bidlot, Jean; Cardinali, Carla; Haiden, Thomas; Janousek, Martin; Klocke, Daniel; Magnusson, Linus; McNally, Tony; Prates, Fernando; Rodwell, Mark; Semane, Noureddine; and Vitart, Frederic. 2012. Progress in predicting tropical systems: the role of convection. ECMWF Research Department Technical Memorandum no 686.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Predictive Turn in Neuroscience;Philosophy of Science;2022-05-25

2. Data Mining the Brain to Decode the Mind;Neural Mechanisms;2020-12-03

3. Big data and prediction: Four case studies;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A;2020-06

4. Prediction versus accommodation in economics;Journal of Economic Methodology;2019-01-02

5. What’s so special about empirical adequacy?;European Journal for Philosophy of Science;2017-03-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3