Opus Magnum-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Opus Magnum

Published:2016-08-01 Issue:3 Volume:12 Page:341-349
ISSN:2198-9613
Container-title:Chinese Semiotic Studies
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Kull Kalevi¹

Affiliation:

1. Tartu University, Tartu, Estonia

Abstract

Abstract This essay speaks briefly about the main argument of John Deely’s book Four Ages of Understanding (2001), pointing to the importance of dialogue between the physical sciences and the semiotic sciences and the centrality of this discussion in the postmodern era as defined by Deely. A bibliography of the reviews of the book is also provided.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Communication,Language and Linguistics

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/css-2016-0033/pdf

Reference51 articles.

1. Ashley, Benedict M. 2003. “The four ages of understanding”, The Thomist 67.1, 133–137.

2. Ashley, Benedict M. 2005. “A postmodern history of philosophy”, American Journal of Semiotics 21.1/4, 5–10.

3. Chamizo Domínguez, Pedro José. 2005. “John Deely, Four Ages of Understanding”, American Journal of Semiotics 21.1/4, 186–190.

4. Clarke, W. Norris. 2003. “Reflections on John Deely’s Four Ages of Understanding”, International Philosophical Quarterly 43.4, 527–537.

5. Clarke, W. Norris. 2005. “Reflections on John Deely’s Four Ages of Understanding”, American Journal of Semiotics 21.1/4, 11–28.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Umberto Eco and John Deely: What they shared;Sign Systems Studies;2017-07-05

2. John Deely, from the Point of View of Biosemiotics;Biosemiotics;2017-04