Investigation of the preanalytical process practices in primary care in Istanbul regarding the newborn screening tests

Author:

Erdim Leyla1ORCID,Zengin Neriman2ORCID,Karaca Büşra3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Science, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa , İstanbul , Türkiye

2. Department of Midwifery, Hamidiye Faculty of Health Science, University of Health Sciences Turkey , İstanbul , Türkiye

3. University of Health Sciences, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital , İstanbul , Türkiye

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The research was conducted as a descriptive study to evaluate the practices and knowledge levels of midwives and nurses in the preanalytical phase of newborn screening tests. Methods The sample of the study consisted of 233 midwives and nurses working in 90 primary healthcare centers in three major districts of Istanbul. The practices and knowledge levels of the participants in the preanalytical phase of blood sampling were evaluated with the Preanalytical Phase Evaluation Form [PPEF]. Results It was determined that only 43.3% of the participants comforted the baby before taking the blood sample, and 61.8% paid attention to the temperature of the heel. Furthermore, 56.2% continued to fill the same circle on the screening card by squeezing the heel due to inadequate blood, 62.7% ensured the blood completely soaked through the front and back of the card, and 36.1% used both sides of the card to fill the circles. Only 53.6% of the participants stored the dried blood samples in the fridge. The mean PPEF knowledge score of the participants was 14.64 ± 3.40. There were statistically significant differences in the knowledge scores of midwives and nurses according to age, educational level, and working year (p<0.05). Conclusions In the study, it was determined that the practices of nurses and midwives in the preanalytical phase were not at a good level. In particular, it is recommended that nurses and midwives who are younger, have a lower educational level, and work fewer years be supervised and supported with training.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3