Prognostic indicators in critically ill poisoned patients: development of a risk-prediction nomogram
Author:
Amirabadizadeh Alireza12, Nakhaee Samaneh2, Jahani Firoozeh2, Soorgi Sima2, Hoyte Christopher O.34, Mehrpour Omid25ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center , Birjand University of Medical Sciences , Birjand , Islamic Republic of Iran 2. Medical Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research Center (MTDRC) , Birjand University of Medical Sciences , Birjand , Islamic Republic of Iran 3. Denver Health and Hospital Authority , Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center , Denver , CO , USA 4. Department of Emergency Medicine , University of Colorado School of Medicine at Anschutz Medical Center , Aurora , CO , USA 5. Arizona Poison & Drug Information Center , the University of Arizona, College of Pharmacy , Tucson , AZ , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The prognosis of acutely poisoned patients is a significant concern for clinical toxicologists. In this study, we sought to determine the clinical and laboratory findings that can contribute to predicting the medical outcomes of poisoned patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs).
Methods
This retrospective study was performed from January 2009 to January 2016 in the ICU of Vali-e-Asr Hospital in Birjand, Iran. We included all patients with the diagnosis of acute poisoning admitted to the ICU. Demographic data, laboratory results, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and acute physiology score + age points + chronic health points (APACHE) II, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, and outcome were collected. Univariate analysis (Mann–Whitney or t-test), multiple logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, and Pearson’s correlation test were performed using SPSS, STATA/SE 13.0, and Nomolog software programs.
Results
The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that five factors were significant for predicting mortality including age (OR 95% CI: 1.1[1.05–1.12], p<0.001), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) (OR 95% CI: 0.71[0.6–0.84], p<0.001), white blood cell (WBC) count (OR 95% CI: 1.1[1.01–1.12], p=0.04), serum sodium (Na) (OR 95% CI: 1.08[1.01–1.15], p=0.02), and creatinine levels (Cr) (OR 95% CI: 1.86 [1.23–2.81], p=0.003). We generated a five-variable risk-prediction nomogram which could both predict mortality risk and identify high-risk patients.
Conclusions
Age, GCS, WBC, serum creatinine, and sodium levels are the best prognostic factors for mortality in poisoned patients admitted to the ICU. The APACHE II score can discriminate between non-survivors and survivors. The nomogram developed in the current study can provide a more precise, quick, and simple analysis of risks, thereby enabling the users to predict mortality and identify high-risk patients.
Funder
Birjand university of medical sciences
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Reference37 articles.
1. Wong, EG, Parker, AM, Leung, DG, Brigham, EP, Arbaje, AI. Association of severity of illness and intensive care unit readmission: a systematic review. Heart Lung 2016;45:3–9 e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.10.040. 2. Hosseini, M, Ramazani, J. Evaluation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scoring systems for prognostication of outcomes among intensive care unit’s patients. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10:168–73. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354x.168817. 3. Naqvi, IH, Mahmood, K, Ziaullaha, S, Kashif, SM, Sharif, A. Better prognostic marker in ICU – APACHE II, SOFA or SAP II!. Pakistan J Med Sci 2016;32:1146–51. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.325.10080. 4. Minne, L, Abu-Hanna, A, de Jonge, E. Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: a systematic review. Crit Care 2008;12:R161. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc7160. 5. Tang, W, Ruan, F, Chen, Q, Chen, S, Shao, X, Gao, J, et al. Independent prognostic factors for acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Respir Care 2016;61:965–70. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04514.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|