Teaching Research Methodologies in Education: Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Portugal

Author:

Freitas André1,Matos João Filipe1,Piedade João2,Teodoro Vitor Duarte1,Serradas Duarte Rosa1

Affiliation:

1. Interdisciplinary Research Centre for Education and Development, Lusofona University , Lisboa , Portugal

2. Education and Training Research and Development Research Unit, Institute of Education, Lisboa University , Lisbon , Portugal

Abstract

Abstract Despite the several mismatches of methodological understanding between teachers and students in higher education, research methodologies in education are a relatively common pedagogical practice in most European advanced courses in education. However, only some studies have shown what pedagogical practices are mobilised by the teachers with their specific scientific conceptions. This article presents and discusses the results of an extensive research study conducted in Portugal with all the teachers involved in teaching research methodologies on master’s and doctoral programmes in education. The results show the personal and professional characteristics of the teachers involved in this teaching and the type of senses, decisions, and challenges experienced when teaching research methodologies. The study identifies and characterises the research culture generated by the different pedagogical practices in this scientific field. Based on the results, we argue that the teachers’ scientific conceptions and pedagogical practices may be developed by a “peer authorial construction of research understanding,” aiming to provide appropriate educational experiences to students in research methodologies courses in advanced studies in education.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference25 articles.

1. Aguado, A. (2009). Teaching research methods: Learning by doing. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(2), 251–260. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215853.

2. Alharbi, M. A., & Alqefari, A. (2021). Reflections on active teaching and learning of research methodology from undergraduates’ and instructor’s perspectives. World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 84–94. doi: 10.5430/wjel.v11n2p84.

3. Creswell, J. (2010). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, United States of America: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.

4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

5. Ekmekci, O., Hancock, A. B., & Swayze, S. (2012). Teaching statistical research methods to graduate students: Lessons learned from three different degree programs. International Journal if Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 272–279.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3