The problem of universalism in (diachronic) cognitive linguistics

Author:

Bergs Alexander1

Affiliation:

1. University of Osnabrück , Osnabrück , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Modern cognitive science and cognitive linguistics are characterized by a universalist perspective, i.e., they are investigating features and principles of cognition which can be found in all members of the human species. This in turn means that they should not only be relevant for present-day cognizers and language users, but also historically. This theoretical, programmatic paper first explores this notion of universalism in cognitive science and cognitive linguistics and suggests that the notion of cognitive universalism should be supplemented by perspectives from cognitive sociology and social cognition. These offer a middle ground in that they look at cognition as it is socially and culturally grounded, and hence inter-individual, but yet not universal. A final section on diachronic cognitive linguistics shows that in language history all three perspectives, individual, social, and universal, can have their place, and that one line of future research should explore this new perspective of social cognition in language history in order to arrive at a fuller picture of historical language users and their cognition.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference34 articles.

1. Adams, Kelly. 2009. The Perseverance of Aboriginal Australian Time Philosophy and its Impact on Integration into the Mainstream Labor Force. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 618. Online: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/618.

2. Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

3. Bergs, Alexander. 2012. The Uniformitarian Principle and the Risk of Anachronism. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 80–98.

4. Bergs, Alexander & Meike Pentrel. 2014. Ælc þara þe þas min word gehierþ and þa wyrcþ. . .: Psycholinguistic perspectives on early English. In Michael Adams, Robert D. Fulk & Laurel Brinton (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language VI: Evidence and method in histories of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 249–76.

5. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2009. Processing Syntax and Morphology: A Neurocognitive Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3