Affiliation:
1. University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , United Kingdom
Abstract
Abstract
This paper shows that morphosyntactic vagueness exists between several minor morphosyntactic categories in Mandarin (modal, protasis connective and types of classifier): these categories share formal distributional properties and functional similarities such that their morphosyntactic distinctions become neutralized in some contexts. Consequently, bidirectionality rather than unidirectionality may characterize these categories diachronically. This paper proposes that any direction of change that is motivated by morphosyntactic vagueness should be regarded as regular and systematic, even if it is not unidirectional, and identifies some directions for future research on morphosyntactic vagueness in diachrony.
Reference61 articles.
1. Ahrens, Kathleen & Chu-Ren Huang. 2016. Classifiers. In Chu-Ren Huang & Dingxu Shi (eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese, 169–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Akatsuka, Noriko & Patricia M. Clancy. 1993. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean. In Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 2, 177–192. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
3. Berg, Thomas. 2014. Boundary permeability: A parameter for linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology 18(3). 489–531.
4. Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Breitbarth, Anne. 2019. Should a conditional marker arise… The diachronic development of conditional sollte in German. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 21.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献