The hit or miss guesswork figuring the deictic centre of the Russian patronymic

Author:

Korostenskienė Julija1

Affiliation:

1. Vilniaus universitetas / Vilnius University , Vilnius , Lithuania

Abstract

Abstract Set within the framework of Proximization Theory, which focuses on the construal of deixis (Chilton 2004, Cap 2006, 2010, 2013), the present study explores address terms (ATs) as used by the Russian-speaking minority in Lithuania (RuL). The collected data strongly suggest that forms of address of this ethnic group have shifted from the mainland standard Russian full name + patronymic to the full name only. Moreover, the previously consistently used polite form of address with the patronymic is now largely regarded as causing discomfort and consequently avoided, especially in mixed groups. The shift in address strategy is attributed to the deictic shift along the axiological axis in the mental representations of the speakers. The patronymic-less ATs, previously placed within the outside deictic centre are shown to be reanalyzed and placed within the interactants’ inside deictic centre. Hesitations in selecting a given AT, a potential issue between the interactants from different age groups, is indicative of the internal conflict of the speaker and their mental switching between the IDC and the ODC. The proposed analysis determines the placement of patronymic and name-only forms on the axiological axis and discusses implications for the differences in Anglo-Saxon and Russian terms for address study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference27 articles.

1. Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.

2. Cap, Piotr. 2010. Proximizing objects, proximizing values. In Urszula Okulska & Piotr Cap (eds.). Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 119–143.

3. Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

4. Cellan-Jones, Rory. 2020, May 29. Twitter hides Trump tweet for “glorifying violence”. BBC, Technology. Online: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52846679 [30 May 2020].

5. Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3