Affiliation:
1. Department of Physics , The Islamia University of Bahawalpur
2. Shaukat Khanum Memorial cancer hospital & research center Lahore Pakistan
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: The Gamma Index is prerequisite to estimate point-by-point difference between measured and calculated dose distribution in terms of both Distance to Agreement (DTA) and Dose Difference (DD). This study aims to inquire what percentage of pixels passing a certain criteria assure a good quality plan and suggest gamma index as efficient mechanism for dose verification of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy plans.
Method: In this study, dose was calculated for 14 head and neck patients and IMRT Quality Assurance was performed with portal dosimetry using the Eclipse treatment planning system. Eclipse software has a Gamma analysis function to compare measured and calculated dose distribution. Plans of this study were deemed acceptable when passing rate was 95% using tolerance for Distance to agreement (DTA) as 3mm and Dose Difference (DD) as 5%.
Result and Conclusion: Thirteen cases pass tolerance criteria of 95% set by our institution. Confidence Limit for DD is 9.3% and for gamma criteria our local CL came out to be 2.0% (i.e., 98.0% passing). Lack of correlation was found between DD and γ passing rate with R2 of 0.0509. Our findings underline the importance of gamma analysis method to predict the quality of dose calculation. Passing rate of 95% is achieved in 93% of cases which is adequate level of accuracy for analyzed plans thus assuring the robustness of SIB IMRT treatment technique. This study can be extended to investigate gamma criteria of 5%/3mm for different tumor localities and to explore confidence limit on target volumes of small extent and simple geometry.
Reference31 articles.
1. [1] Kouloulias V, Antypas C, Liakouli Z, et al. The first implementation of IMRT technique for head & neck and prostate cancer patients in public sector in Greece: feasibility, treatment planning and dose delivery verification using the delta (4PT) Pre-Treatment volumetric quality assurance system. J BUON. 2014;20(1):196-205.
2. [2] Roxby KJ, Crosbie JC. Pre-treatment verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans using a commercial electronic portal dosimetry system. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2010;33(1):51-57.10.1007/s13246-010-0001-0
3. [3] Franceschini D, Paiar F, Meattini I, et al. Simultaneous integrated boost–intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(12):E97-103.
4. [4] Mohan R, Wu Q, Manning M, Schmidt-Ullrich R. Radiobiological considerations in the design of fractionation strategies for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46(3):619-630.10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00438-1
5. [5] Krishnan J, Rao S, Hegde S, Shetty J. A Dosimetric Comparison of Double Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Large Field Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. IJMPCERO. 2015;4(4):353-363.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献