Affiliation:
1. Institute for Political Science , University of Muenster , Münster , NRW , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
How is Germany doing with respect to the fight against COVID-19? Did the German Federal and the country’s Regional Governments enact a coordinated approach, and did the sector have the opportunity to co-operate with government and have a “voice” in the policy process? Based on the results of recent empirical studies and desk-top, internet-based research, these questions are addressed and the outcome is that there were numerous programs issued by the Federal and regional German governments that buffer the effects of the crisis is having on the sector. However, the programs were not developed in co-operation with the sector and were not easy to access, particularly for small and non-professionalized nonprofits.
Subject
Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science
Reference24 articles.
1. Berman, S. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49 (3): 401–29, https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0008.
2. Bode, I. 2012. Die Infrastruktur des postindustriellen Wohlfahrtsstaates. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
3. Boeßenecker, K.-H., and M. Vilain. 2013. Spitzenverbände der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege. Eine Einführung in Organisationsstrukturen und Handlungsfelder. Weinheim: Beltz/Juventa.
4. Bundesvorstand der Humanistischen Union 2020. “Grund- und Menschrechte gerade in der Krise bewahren.” Mitteilungen 241 (1/2020): 2–3. http://www.humanistische-union.de/nc/aktuelles/aktuelles_detail/back/alle-beitraege/article/strategien-kommunaler-sicherheitspolitik-1/s/.
5. Grande, E. 2018. “Zivilgesellschaft, politischer Konflikt und soziale Bewegungen.” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen - Analysen zu Demokratie und Zivilgesellschaft 31 (1–2): 52–9, https://doi.org/10.1515/fjsb-2018-0007.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献