Affiliation:
1. School of Law , University of Bradford , Bradford , UK
Abstract
Abstract
The OECD led BEPS project attempts key changes to the international tax standards to limit harmful tax avoidance. First, it is found that calls for the BEPS project are based on arguments (illicit financial flows and tax competition) that are supported by limited evidence and hence may not offer much fiscal gain to the developing countries. Second, it is found that the BEPS project would, through information sharing, further limit the fiscal jurisdiction of capital importing states. Further it is found that tax competition, even if existing in a limited form, is a result of the international tax architecture and the externalities caused by it. In fact, it is seen that the MNCs actually reduce the inefficiencies created by this tax architecture and thereby reduce transaction costs. By agreeing to the BEPS agenda of information sharing the developing countries would be paying the cost of internalising the externality.
Subject
Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Development
Reference165 articles.
1. Advocacy by African Union has helped to link the discourse on illicit financial flows to sustainable development goals, Refer, Illicit Financial Flows: Report of the High Level Panel on Illicit Financial Flows from Africa, Commissioned by the AU/ECA Conference of Ministers of Finance (July 2021), available at: , accessed January 21, 2023.
2. Ahmed Muhammad, Ashfaq, UN MTC Article 26: Inequitable Exchange of Information Regime—Questionable Efficacy in Asymmetrical Bilateral Setting, 11 Laws, no. 5 (2022).
3. Aliber, Robert Z., The International Money Game (5th ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan, 1987).
4. Apeldoorn, Laurens Van, BEPS, Tax Sovereignty and Global Justice, 21 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, no. 4 (2016).
5. Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., International Tax as International Law: An Analysis of the International Tax Regime (New York: Cambridge University, 2006).