Multi-objective Optimization Algorithms with the Island Metaheuristic for Effective Project Management Problem Solving

Author:

Brester Christina1,Ryzhikov Ivan1,Semenkin Eugene1

Affiliation:

1. Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology , Institute of Computer Science and Telecommunications , 31 »Krasnoyarskiy Rabochiy« ave., Krasnoyarsk, 660037 , Russian Federation

Abstract

Abstract Background and Purpose: In every organization, project management raises many different decision-making problems, a large proportion of which can be efficiently solved using specific decision-making support systems. Yet such kinds of problems are always a challenge since there is no time-efficient or computationally efficient algorithm to solve them as a result of their complexity. In this study, we consider the problem of optimal financial investment. In our solution, we take into account the following organizational resource and project characteristics: profits, costs and risks. Design/Methodology/Approach: The decision-making problem is reduced to a multi-criteria 0-1 knapsack problem. This implies that we need to find a non-dominated set of alternative solutions, which are a trade-off between maximizing incomes and minimizing risks. At the same time, alternatives must satisfy constraints. This leads to a constrained two-criterion optimization problem in the Boolean space. To cope with the peculiarities and high complexity of the problem, evolution-based algorithms with an island meta-heuristic are applied as an alternative to conventional techniques. Results: The problem in hand was reduced to a two-criterion unconstrained extreme problem and solved with different evolution-based multi-objective optimization heuristics. Next, we applied a proposed meta-heuristic combining the particular algorithms and causing their interaction in a cooperative and collaborative way. The obtained results showed that the island heuristic outperformed the original ones based on the values of a specific metric, thus showing the representativeness of Pareto front approximations. Having more representative approximations, decision-makers have more alternative project portfolios corresponding to different risk and profit estimations. Since these criteria are conflicting, when choosing an alternative with an estimated high profit, decision-makers follow a strategy with an estimated high risk and vice versa. Conclusion: In the present paper, the project portfolio decision-making problem was reduced to a 0-1 knapsack constrained multi-objective optimization problem. The algorithm investigation confirms that the use of the island meta-heuristic significantly improves the performance of genetic algorithms, thereby providing an efficient tool for Financial Responsibility Centres Management.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Business and International Management,Management Information Systems

Reference19 articles.

1. Alves, M.J., & Almeida, M. (2007). MOTGA: A multiobjective Tchebycheff based genetic algorithm for the multidimensional knapsack problem. Computers & Operations Research, 34(11), 3458-3470, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.02.00810.1016/j.cor.2006.02.008

2. Aslan, O., Mert Kantar, Y., & Usta, I. (2015). Genetic algorithms for solving portfolio allocation models based on relative-entropy, mean and variance. Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 2 (12), 7-12. Retrieved from http://jsrad.org/wp-content/2015/Issue%2012,%202015/2jj.pdf

3. Brester Ch. & Semenkin E. (2015). Cooperative Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm with Parallel Implementation. Advances in Swarm and Computational Intelligence, LNCS vol. 9140. pp. 471–478. Springer Nature.

4. Crainic, T. G., Toulouse, M. (2010). Parallel metaheuristics. In Handbook of metaheuristics, pp. 497–541. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-1665-5_17

5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6 (2), 182–197, https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.99601710.1109/4235.996017

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3