Affiliation:
1. ”Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iasi , Carol I Blvd, no. 11, Iasi , Romania
Abstract
Abstract
Economic entities get involved in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) because they are interested in external growth strategies which can lead to an increase in the wealth of the shareholders of the participating entities. In M&As, from an acquirer or a target’s perspective, a company brings its resources, which can be material or immaterial (knowledge). In the post-M&A phase, through the integration process the shareholders expect synergy gains, or that the combined firms to report efficiency gains higher than if they would activate separately. In nowadays, in a boundaryless economy, one of the most appreciated resources is knowledge. In this respect, the intangible assets, in general, and patents, in particular, are the accounting representation of knowledge in a company. They are also considered to be predictors for the deal value paid to the target company. To those we add the size of the target company, its core activity and the value of the research and development expenses, the latter being a significant mediator variable for the proposed models.
Publisher
Editura Universitatii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iasi
Reference52 articles.
1. 1. Aevoae, George Marian, Roxana Manuela Dicu and Daniela Neonila Mardiros (2019), “The determinants of ownership in M&As: An analysis of the stake purchases in Romanian acquisitions”, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Accounting and Management Information Systems (AMIS IAAER), pp. 253-270.
2. 2. Bettinazzi, Emanuele, Danny Miller, Mario Daniele Amore and Guido Corbetta (2019), “Ownership Similarity in M&A Target Selection”, Bocconi University Management & Technology Research Paper Series, no. 14
3. 3. Betz, Frederick (2003), Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change, 3rd Edition, New York: Wiley-Interscience.
4. 4. Bromiley, Philip and Devaki Rau (2016), “Operations management and the resource based view: Another view”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 41, pp. 95–106.10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.003
5. 5. Bruner, Robert F. (1988), “The Use of Excess Cash and Debt Capacity as a Motive for Merger”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 199-217.10.2307/2330881