Abstract
Abstract
The persisting usage of virtual means for the completion of activities usually or traditionally held in person stimulates the reflection about the possible effect that doing philosophy online could have on the philosophical integrity of the process. The body question seems to be pivotal in this context not only as far as concerning virtuality issues but also philosophy’s care to integrate the body into its routines – when it is practiced physically – especially in the frame of an education still hesitating to embrace embodied experience. The body deficiency, its vanishing, is first of all a question for philosophy and its ways to be practiced today – on that basis, passing through virtuality’s discourses can enlighten the relevant reflection.
Reference43 articles.
1. Adams, P. (2014): Communication in Virtual Worlds. In: Grimshaw, M. (ed.), Τhe Oxford Handbook of Virtuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239-253.
2. Bakardjieva, M./Gaden, G. (2012): Web 2.0 Technologies of the Self. In: Philosophy & Technology 25 (3): 399-413.
3. Barthes, R. (1975): Roland Barthes par Roland Barthes. Paris: Seuil.
4. Barthes, R. (1982): Empire of Signs. New York: Hill & Wang: The Noonday Press.
5. Beckett, S. (1984): Play. A Play in One Act. In: Beckett, S., Collected Shorter Plays. New York: Grove Press, pp. 145-160.