The impact of lateral placenta on preeclampsia and small for gestational age neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author:
Siargkas Antonios1, Tsakiridis Ioannis1ORCID, Grammenos Petros1, Apostolopoulou Aikaterini2, Giouleka Sonia1, Mamopoulos Apostolos1, Athanasiadis Apostolos1, Dagklis Themistoklis1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences , Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece 2. Laboratory of Hygiene, Social & Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences , Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively summarize the present data on the association of prenatally identified lateral placenta in singleton pregnancies with small for gestational age (SGA) neonates, preeclampsia and other perinatal outcomes.
Methods
From inception to November 2021, we searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus and The Cochrane Library for papers comparing the risk of SGA and preeclampsia, as well as other perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies with a prenatally identified lateral placenta to those with non-lateral placentas. The revised Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of eligible papers. The I2 test was employed to evaluate the heterogeneity of outcomes among the studies. To investigate the possibility of publication bias, funnel plots were constructed. Prospero RN: CRD42021251590.
Results
The search yielded 5,420 articles, of which 16 were chosen, comprising of 15 cohort studies and one case control study with a total of 4,947 cases of lateral and 96,035 of non-lateral placenta (controls) reported. SGA neonates were more likely to be delivered in cases with a lateral placenta (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.54–1.96; p<0.00001; I2=47%). Likewise, placental laterality was linked to a higher risk of fetal growth restriction (OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.54–3.06; p<0.00001; I2=0%), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (OR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.65–3.51; p=0.0001; I2=80%), preeclampsia (OR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.92–4.44; p<0.0001; I2=82%) and preterm delivery (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.46–1.87; p<0.00001; I2=0%).
Conclusions
The prenatal diagnosis of a lateral placenta appears to be associated with a higher incidence of preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery and SGA. This may prove useful in screening for these conditions at the second trimester anomaly scan.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference29 articles.
1. Seckin, KD, Cakmak, B, Karsli, MF, Yeral, MI, Gultekin, IB, Oz, M, et al.. Is lateral localisation of placenta a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes? J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;35:696–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2015.1007343. 2. Salomon, LJ, Alfirevic, Z, Berghella, V, Bilardo, C, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Johnsen, SL, et al.. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8831. 3. Becker, RH, Vonk, R, Mende, BC, Ragosch, V, Entezami, M. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:496–501. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00423.x. 4. Kofinas, AD, Penry, M, Greiss, FCJr, Meis, PJ, Nelson, LH. The effect of placental location on uterine artery flow velocity waveforms. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:1504–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(88)90584-4. 5. Sotiriadis, A, Hernandez-Andrade, E, da Silva Costa, F, Ghi, T, Glanc, P, Khalil, A, et al.. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;53:7–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20105.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|