Fetal adrenal gland size and umbilical artery Doppler in growth-restricted fetuses
Author:
Oelmeier Kathrin1, Möllers Mareike1, Köster Helen A.1, Willy Daniela1, Bormann Eike2, Braun Janina1, Klockenbusch Walter1, Schmitz Ralf1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University Hospital of Münster , Münster , Germany 2. Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster , Münster , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
In fetal growth restriction (FGR), Doppler ultrasound is the most important method for the detection and management. However, additional parameters are needed to improve the distinction between constitutionally small fetuses and fetuses affected by FGR.
Methods
A total of 445 singleton pregnancies between 23 and 40 weeks of gestation were included in our retrospective study, of which 67 with FGR and 378 normal fetuses. A 2D-plane of the fetal adrenal gland was obtained and the adrenal gland ratio was measured. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the association of fetal Doppler and adrenal gland ratio with outcome parameters. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the statistical significance of “PI of the umbilical artery” and “adrenal gland ratio” as prognostic factors for intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
Results
PI of the umbilical artery was shown to correlate with outcome parameters (WG_Delivery: r=−0.125, p=0.008; birth weight: r=−0.268, p<0.001; birth weight centile: r=−0.248, p<0.001; APGAR at 5 min: r=−0.117, p=0.014). Adrenal gland ratio showed no correlation with any of the outcome parameters. In logistic regression however, both PI of the umbilical artery and the adrenal ratio were shown to be significantly associated with fetal IUGR. When combining the two parameters, predictive value was superior to the predictive value of each individual parameter (AUC 0.738 [95% CI 0.670; 0.806]).
Conclusions
The adrenal gland ratio can be a useful addition to Doppler ultrasound when it comes to the detection of fetal FGR. Prospective studies are needed to establish references ranges and cut-off values for clinical decision-making.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference25 articles.
1. Nardozza, LM, Caetano, AC, Zamarian, AC, Mazzola, JB, Silva, CP, Macal, VM, et al.. Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295:1061–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4341-9. 2. Zur, RL, Kingdom, JC, Parks, WT, Hobson, SR. The placental basis of fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2020;47:81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.10.008. 3. Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, Geary, MP, Kennelly, MM, McAuliffe, FM, O’Donoghue, K, et al.. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:290.e1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007. 4. Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghio, A, Baschat, AA, Baker, PN, et al.. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:333–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15884. 5. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Publications Committee, Berkley, E, Chauhan, SP, Abuhamad, A. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:300–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.022.
|
|