Vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: who can benefit and who cannot? Evidence-based recommendations for clinical use

Author:

Conde-Agudelo Agustin12,Romero Roberto13456

Affiliation:

1. Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research , Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda , MD and Detroit , MI , USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit , MI , USA

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Michigan State University East Lansing , MI , USA

5. Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics , Wayne State University , Detroit , MI , USA

6. Detroit Medical Center , Detroit , MI , USA

Abstract

Abstract Vaginal progesterone (VP) has been recommended to prevent preterm birth (PTB) in women at high-risk. However, there is controversy as to whether VP is efficacious in some subsets of high-risk women. In this review, we examined the current best evidence on the efficacy of VP to prevent PTB in several subsets of high-risk women and provided recommendations for its clinical use. Compelling evidence indicates that VP reduces the risk of PTB and improves perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations with a short cervix (≤25 mm), both with and without a history of spontaneous PTB. VP appears promising to reduce the risk of PTB in twin gestations with a short cervix (≤25 mm) and in singleton gestations conceived by assisted reproductive technologies, but further research is needed. There is no convincing evidence that supports prescribing VP to prevent PTB in singleton gestations based solely on the history of spontaneous preterm birth. Persuasive evidence shows that VP does not prevent PTB nor does it improve perinatal outcomes in unselected twin gestations and in singleton gestations with a history of spontaneous PTB and a cervical length >25 mm. There is no evidence supporting the use of VP to prevent PTB in triplet or higher-order multifetal gestations, singleton gestations with a positive fetal fibronectin test and clinical risk factors for PTB, and gestations with congenital uterine anomalies or uterine leiomyoma. In conclusion, current evidence indicates that VP should only be recommended in singleton gestations with a short cervix, regardless of the history of spontaneous PTB.

Funder

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference54 articles.

1. Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Osterman, MJ. Births in the United States, 2021. NCHS Data Brief 2022:1–8.

2. Chawanpaiboon, S, Vogel, JP, Moller, AB, Lumbiganon, P, Petzold, M, Hogan, D, et al.. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Global Health 2019;7:e37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30451-0.

3. Perin, J, Mulick, A, Yeung, D, Villavicencio, F, Lopez, G, Strong, KL, et al.. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the sustainable development goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022;6:106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(21)00311-4.

4. Institute of Medicine Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes. The national academies collection: reports funded by national institutes of health. In: Behrman, RE, Butler, AS, editors. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), National Academy of Sciences; 2007.

5. Manuck, TA, Rice, MM, Bailit, JL, Grobman, WA, Reddy, UM, Wapner, RJ, et al.. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:103.e1–4.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3