Affiliation:
1. Head of the Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Pediatrics , Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto , Portugal
2. Senior Consultant of Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João , Porto , Portugal
3. Senior Researcher of Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Sistemas de Saúde (CINTESIS) , Porto , Portugal
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The objective of this study is to present the why, what and how about computerized analysis of cardiotocograms (cCTG) and the SisPorto system for cCTG.
Content
A narrative review about cCTG and the SisPorto system for cCTG is presented. The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) performed so far have evidenced that cCGT compared to traditional CTG analysis may save time spent in hospital for women, in the antepartum period, and is objective with at least equivalent results in maternal and perinatal outcomes, both in the ante and intrapartum periods. The SisPorto system for cCTG closely follows the FIGO guidelines for fetal monitoring. It may be used both in the ante and intrapartum periods, alone or connected to a central monitoring station, with simultaneous monitoring of fetal and maternal signals, not only in singletons but also in twins. It has been assessed in technical, physiopathological and clinical studies, namely in one large multicentric international RCT during labor and two meta-analysis.
Summary and outlook
There is evidence that cCTG may be useful in clinical practice with advantages compared to traditional CTG analysis, although without clear impact on the decrease of preventable maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. More studies are warranted, namely on technical improvements and assessment in larger studies in a wider range of clinical settings.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference79 articles.
1. Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CWG. System 8000®: computerised antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med 1991;19:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1991.19.1-2.47.
2. Bracero, LA, Morgan, S, Byrne, DW. Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1254–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70118-3.
3. Steyn, DW, Odendaal, HJ. Routine or computerized cardiotocography in severe preeclampsia? a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Invest 1997;7:166–71.
4. Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GM, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD007863.
5. Baker, H, Pilarski, N, Hodgetts-Morton, VA, Morris, RK. Comparison of visual and computerised antenatal cardiotocography in the prevention of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021;263:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.048.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献