Fragen zur Theorie der Statusinkonsistenz: Auf dem Wege zu einer Neuorientierung? / Status Inconsistency Theory: Towards a Reorientation?

Abstract

Abstract Status inconsistency theory is criticized on the basis of some recent results. According to some of these studies additional variables should be added to the theory of status inconsistency, e.g. the mutual expectations which people have while interacting with one another, the subjective saliency of some of the status dimensions (and the respective combinations of status dimensions) as well as social visibility. Some questionable assumptions underlying the theory are being discussed. It turns out that numerous important assumptions are made which are considered to be plausible. In reality, however, they first have to be checked empirically. Other studies raise the question, whether a theory of status inconsistency is even necessary. Dimensions more relevant as to behavior are possibly covered in alternative theories. Also these theories may provide for more general statements so that status inconsistency theory appears to be only a sub-case. Among these theories discussed in the second half of the paper could be named: Role theory, reference group theory (with the sub-cases theory of relative deprivation and theory of cross pressures) as well as, above all, the theories of cognitive consistency.